
I've gone full circle and ended up where I started, back in the hurly-burly of daily newspapers (where, as Stella Gibbons memorably remarked, one's style, like one's life, is nasty, brutish and short): I became Melbourne theatre reviewer for the Australian, and began doing the odd gig for the Guardian. And then Howard was voted out of government and I accidentally deleted four years of email. No wonder I'm tired.
While I'm crunching the numbers - it's kind of fun and, in its own limited way, revealing - I count around 30 of those shows as things I wouldn't have missed for the world, making an excellence rating of about 30 per cent. That's pretty good going with something as volatile as theatre. This heads up to about 15 duds, shows that bravely challenged the trend of time's quickening and made it run like a river of porridge. This leaves around 55 per cent in the "good" category, shows I enjoyed without their blowing me away.
I've never been in a position to see everything on in Melbourne, and all through the year there have been shows I couldn't get to, and which - after hearing breathless reports from my extensive network of theatre spies - I'm sorry I ended up missing. But all the same, it's a fairly decent sampling. And it seems to me that, generally speaking, Melbourne theatre passes the medical with flying colours. The hue is rosy, the limbs are making lively gestures, the renaissance is on. There are those who like their culture dead, the chief zombie being Robin Usher of the Age, but me, I prefer to leave the theatre with my heart beating.

The Malthouse has had a year of consolidation, with an eye turned to crowd-pleasers like Geoffrey Rush in Ionesco's Exit The King or Sleeping Beauty, and return seasons of successful shows from the independent theatre scene - The Pitch, from La Mama, The Eisteddfod, from the Store Room, or A Large Attendance in the Antechamber, from everywhere.

I've enjoyed everything I've seen there this year - it's been various, stimulating, controversial and fun - and I can't say that about anywhere else. I'm not going to argue with any of those who are saying that the Malthouse is the most exciting theatre company in Australia.


This year dance indelibly entered my theatrical lexicon. It was, on the whole, a year to catch up - I saw several wonderful remounts. I've already mentioned Tense Dave, but there was also Lucy Guerin's Love Me and Aether, Chunky Move's Glow, and, courtesy of MIAF, a retrospective of Merce Cunningham. I might be learning something... Among the new work, last week's Brindabella from BalletLab was a knockout, and La Mama also hosted a memorable performance of Deborah Levy's B-File.
Outside the institutions, my top shows were Little Death's notable production of Philip Ridley's Mercury Fur, Simon Stone's wonderful adaptation of Wedekind's Spring Awakening and Ranters Theatre's gorgeous Holiday. Outside Melbourne, a tiny Adelaide company, Floogle, enterprisingly flew me over to see their production of Pinter's The Homecoming, which was as elegant a reading of that play as I am likely to see. There was Eleventh Hour's rivetingly erotic retelling of Othello. And - sacre bleu! - one of my theatre highlights was seen at the Melbourne International Film Festival - A Poor Theatre's The Tragedy of Hamlet: Prince of Denmark, which counts because I saw it first as a play and because it's part of the Malthouse's first season next year.

So it wasn't all champagne and skittles. Which brings me to the Melbourne Theatre Company, currently looking like the ailing limb in an otherwise rather fit theatrical body.
To be fair, it wasn't all bad. Arthur Miller's All My Sons was a straight production of a classic that went like a train, although I admit that contrary reports from many reliable sources of the subsequent season made me wonder if the cast had reserved all their vim for opening night. I thought the MTC's production of Edward Albee's Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf? the most moving of the three I saw this year, and Thom Pain was a delightful surprise. I had a long argument with Alan Bennett's The History Boys, but I felt it was worth doing all the same.

I guess Phillips has had a distracting year - not only is the MTC building a new theatre, but he's been out and about in the commercial world. But given the liveliness and invention of the theatre culture around it, our state company ought to be doing better. Much better. To go back to the dubious number crunching: if the dud percentage of theatre generally was 15 per cent, the MTC's individual dud percentage was around a third. And although several shows made my "good" category, not one blew me away.

Well, that was my 2007. It was a vintage year, and it's brought me a great deal of pleasure. I want to thank all the theatre companies who kindly provided me with tickets, the many people who have encouraged me through the year, my blogger colleagues and, most of all, my readers and commenters (especially those who take issue with me). I've had a brilliant time, and I hope it's mutual.
TN is now taking some badly-needed time off, and will be back refreshed and - theoretically, at least - raring to go in the New Year. Me, I'm heading back to my poetic roots over the Yuletide break, and writing a new translation of Beowulf. (I don't know why, but sometimes one can't help these things). So a happy solstice to all of you, and I'll see you in 2008.
Pictures from top: Glow, by Chunky Move; Luke Mullins in Little Death's Mercury Fur; Geoffrey Rush and Julie Forsyth in Exit the King, Malthouse; Black by Anna Tregloan, Malthouse; Kagemi, Sankai Juku, Melbourne Festival; Ben Hjorth in the VCA's King Lear; Ian McKellen in the RSC's King Lear; Don's Party, MTC; The Season at Sarsaparilla, STC.
Hey Alison, thought I'd let you know (finally) what shows I ended up making it to on my week-long trip to Melbourne. I only made it to three shows - A Large Attendance at the Antechamber (strange and terrific); Don Giovanni (I fell asleep and left at the intermission - I have decided that opera is sadly not for me); and Not What I Am - Othello Retold, which I absolutely loved. Missed out on Spamalot though, which I think I would have prefered to the Don. I also considered seeing The Kreutzer Sonata, Glengarry Glen Ross, Beta Life and Motortown. There is so much original and interesting theatre to indulge in in Melbourne, you guys are very lucky! I had a wonderful holiday, and thanks for your advice Alison.
ReplyDeleteYours,
Anna
Oh, I forgot to mention - when I saw A Large Attendance... a couple exited the theatre in the middle of the performance, in response to Galton's discourse on the Jewish type. They stated that they were leaving, and that it was very racist - Lipson (as Galton) said that they should stay and see why he's talking about it, but they refused and left. Quite interesting, especially when you consider the idea that Lipson raised later that if you stayed to watch you were supporting Galton's beliefs.
ReplyDeletePerhaps they didn't know what the show was actually going to be about.
Yours,
Anna
Hi Anna - that sounds like an excellent range of theatre! And I'm very glad you enjoyed it.
ReplyDeleteOpera is an absurd artform really. I am very seldom attacked by slumber in the theatre, no matter how bored I am, but opera can overwhelm me with irresistable waves of sleep. And I once got uncontrollable giggles in the last act of Turandot. But it can also be an incredible experience. It all depends... I didn't understand 19C opera really until I saw a really good production of some French opera (not a famous one, the name escapes me) in the opera house in Bern, in Switzerland, one of those gorgeous gilt 18C theatres that are just the right size, have beautiful acoustics and are ridiculously overdressed. It suddenly all made sense in there. And I'm sure seeing opera in Italy would be an experience, one day I'll do it. I think it's hard to do 19C opera in the Arts Centre. On the other hand, when opera is good, it's incredible. Barrie Kosky has done some great operas - a wonderful version of Berg's Wozzek at the AO and a really gorgeous Magic Flute at (was it? gosh!) the MTC many years ago, which was all fantasy and lightness.
PS The discomfort when Lipson began to talk about the "Jewish type" was palpable in the audience I sat in too. My favourite moment was when Galton looked down his trousers and discovered he was being impersonated by the Wrong Sort Of Person...
ReplyDeleteI don't know what it was - I really did try to like it, and of course I could tell that it was very good production with fabulous singers and music. One reason I think it was difficult for me was that because I was not extremely familiar with the story or music, and cannot speak Italian, I had to follow the surtitles to understand the words. And that automatically meant I had to disconnect from the reality of the world, and perhaps my left-brain got impatient whilst the singers were repeating lines over and over again and I was waiting for the story to continue (strangely I do not have this problem with either foreign language films or musicals in English). As well as this, I just could not suspend my disbelief and find the characters engaging or sympathetic (Although it must be said that the actor playing the Don was quite attractive). I found them tedious. There is stylised acting, and then there is over-the-top melodrama and pantomine. Oh well, a useful experience I'm sure.
ReplyDeleteAnna
As someone who saw all three of the Opera Australia Spring productions (and will be writing about them soon), I can safely say that Don Giovanni was by far the weakest in terms of theatre. I mean, none of them are ever great as theatre (well, Neil Armfield's production of The Marriage of Figaro was great, but that was last year...), but Giovanni was particularly weak. This had a lot to do with Teddy Tahu Rhodes' performance in the titular role. The man's singing voice is something else (and, yes, he's rather attractive – though not, I would argue, with that ridiculous-looking wig), but his acting is abysmal, overstated and laughable. His Don looks, smells and tastes of ham.
ReplyDeleteThere were some far more impressive performances this year, in far more impressive productions: Emma Matthews in Les contes d'Hoffmann; Rachelle Durkin in Alcina; and, especially, Sally Matthews in Rusalka (the part was played by Cheryl Barker in Sydney). And there was some very good theatre, too: Rusalka was outstanding.
A happy new year, Alison ... as they pass with astonishing frequency ... Isn't our diminishing time perception a fascinating [and terrifying] thing ...? Do we cease to log things in our mind because we've seen them before - and thus does it appear as if not much has happened and therefore little time passed ... Or do our brains just fill up...?
ReplyDeleteCongratulations on your blog. You're a perfect role model for patience.
love
sam